Where does the 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister lodged with the Indiana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister incident. The state report is dated July 29, 2026. The incident itself is dated March 27, 2026.

Timeline

124 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

March 27, 2026Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
July 29, 2026Report filed in IndianaDate the notice was lodged with the Indiana Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: Indiana
Date reported: July 29, 2026
Incident date: March 27, 2026
Receiving office: Indiana Attorney General

Case notes

Taft Stettinius & Hollister, an organization headquartered in Indiana, has reported a data incident that occurred on March 27, 2026. The firm filed a public notification regarding this event on July 29, 2026, making it part of the official public record.

The public filing does not specify the particular categories of personal information that were involved in this incident. Therefore, the exact nature of the information potentially exposed remains undescribed in the publicly available records.

Individuals who receive an official notification from Taft Stettinius & Hollister are strongly advised to carefully review that document. Such letters typically provide precise information about what data was involved and any recommended actions specific to the individual's situation.

In instances where personal information may have been compromised, general protective measures are recommended. These include routinely monitoring all financial accounts and credit reports for any unusual activity. Additionally, individuals should remain cautious of unsolicited communications, such as emails, calls, or texts, that request personal details or financial credentials.

This entry on DataBreachCaseFile.com serves as a factual record of the reported incident, drawing solely from the official public filing by Taft Stettinius & Hollister.

Questions about this case file

Where does the 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister lodged with the Indiana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Indiana data breaches

Filing source: Indiana Attorney General

Named in the 0Taft Stettinius & Hollister breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More Indiana case files