Where does the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report American Association of Critical-Care Nurses lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses incident. The state report is dated August 29, 2025. The incident itself is dated March 8, 2025.

Timeline

174 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

March 8, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
August 29, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: August 29, 2025
Incident date: March 8, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN), based in California, has formally reported a data incident that took place on March 8, 2025. This disclosure was made in a public filing on August 29, 2025, confirming that the organization is currently investigating the scope and nature of the event.

According to the official filing, the incident involved the potential exposure of personal information. The specific categories of data affected have not been detailed in the public record. This report serves as a public acknowledgment of the incident as documented by the organization.

As the investigation remains active, further specifics regarding how the breach occurred or the full extent of its impact are not yet publicly available. This filing primarily documents the existence of the incident and the ongoing efforts by AACN to understand it fully.

For individuals who receive a direct notification from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, it is important to carefully review the information provided. While specific data types are not listed, general protective steps commonly recommended include remaining vigilant for unusual activity, exercising caution with unsolicited communications, and promptly reporting any suspicious occurrences.

This information is derived from public regulatory filings and is intended to help individuals verify the details of any direct breach notification they may receive from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Questions about this case file

Where does the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report American Association of Critical-Care Nurses lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files