Where does the Anne Arundel Dermatology case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Anne Arundel Dermatology lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Anne Arundel Dermatology incident. The state report is dated July 11, 2025. The incident itself is dated February 14, 2025.

Timeline

147 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

February 14, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
July 11, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: July 11, 2025
Incident date: February 14, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Anne Arundel Dermatology, based in California, has publicly reported a data incident stemming from an event that occurred on February 14, 2025. The company filed its official notice of this breach on July 11, 2025, acknowledging that personal information may have been compromised.

Details surrounding the nature of the breach remain unspecified in public filings. Anne Arundel Dermatology has not disclosed the specific types of data involved, nor has it provided an exact number of individuals affected by this security event. The notice indicates that the matter is still under active investigation.

As the investigation proceeds, affected individuals are advised to exercise caution. Even though the specific categories of exposed data are not yet known, it is prudent to monitor all personal and financial accounts for any signs of unusual or unauthorized activity.

General protective measures include reviewing account statements for discrepancies, placing fraud alerts on credit reports, and being wary of unsolicited communications that might attempt to phish for more information. Regularly changing passwords for online accounts and using strong, unique passwords for each service is also a widely recommended security practice.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Anne Arundel Dermatology case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Anne Arundel Dermatology lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Anne Arundel Dermatology breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files