Where does the BMS Holdings, LP case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report BMS Holdings, LP lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: BMS Holdings, LP Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the BMS Holdings, LP incident. The state report is dated June 23, 2025. The incident itself is dated February 24, 2025.

Timeline

119 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

February 24, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
June 23, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: June 23, 2025
Incident date: February 24, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

BMS Holdings, LP, based in California, has publicly reported a data security incident. The company identified the breach event as occurring on February 24, 2025. This incident was subsequently filed with regulatory bodies on June 23, 2025, indicating a period of internal investigation and preparation before public disclosure.

While the exact nature of the breach remains unspecified in the public record, it has been confirmed that personal information was involved. At present, the investigation into the full scope and impact of this security event is ongoing, according to the available details.

Individuals who believe they may be affected by this incident should carefully review any official notification letters received from BMS Holdings, LP. These letters are the primary source for understanding how the breach specifically impacts them and what, if any, specific protective measures the company may recommend or offer.

In the absence of specific details about the exposed data, general protective steps are advised. These include monitoring all personal accounts for unusual activity, changing passwords for online services, and exercising caution with unsolicited communications, especially those asking for personal details. Regularly checking credit reports can also help identify any unauthorized activity.

Questions about this case file

Where does the BMS Holdings, LP case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report BMS Holdings, LP lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the BMS Holdings, LP breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files