Where does the Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. lodged with the Massachusetts Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. incident. The state report is dated July 18, 2025.

Timeline

July 18, 2025Report filed in MassachusettsDate the notice was lodged with the Massachusetts Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: Massachusetts
Date reported: July 18, 2025
Receiving office: Massachusetts Attorney General

Case notes

Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C., a firm specializing in legal services and complex litigation, reported a data security incident to the Massachusetts Attorney General on July 18, 2025. This filing acknowledges a breach of its digital network infrastructure. The company’s operations involve handling a significant volume of confidential data, which can make it a target for malicious actors.

While the exact nature of the breach and the specific data types involved were not detailed in the public filing, the incident suggests that personal information may have been accessed by unauthorized parties. The firm has indicated that an investigation is currently underway to determine the full extent of the compromise.

When personal information is exposed in a data breach, individuals face potential risks such as identity theft or various forms of fraud. Although the specific categories of data involved in this incident are not available in the public record, it is prudent for anyone who receives a notification letter to proceed with caution.

To help mitigate potential risks, it is widely recommended that individuals regularly monitor financial account statements and credit reports for any suspicious activity. Placing a fraud alert or security freeze on credit files can also provide an additional layer of protection. Be wary of unsolicited communications that claim to be from the compromised entity or offer assistance related to the breach.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. lodged with the Massachusetts Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Massachusetts data breaches

Named in the Davis, Hatley, Haffeman & Tighe, P.C. breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More Massachusetts case files