Where does the Electronics For Imaging, Inc. case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Electronics For Imaging, Inc. lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Electronics For Imaging, Inc. Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Electronics For Imaging, Inc. incident. The state report is dated June 20, 2025. The incident itself is dated September 17, 2024.

Timeline

276 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

September 17, 2024Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
June 20, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: June 20, 2025
Incident date: September 17, 2024
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (EFI), headquartered in Fremont, California, has disclosed a data breach that affected personal information. The company identified the incident as having taken place on September 17, 2024. A formal report regarding this event was filed on June 20, 2025.

Specific details regarding the type of breach and the categories of personal information involved have not been publicly specified in the regulatory filing. EFI has indicated that an investigation into the incident is ongoing, meaning that the full extent of the compromise and its impact are still being determined.

Due to the ongoing nature of the investigation, the company has not yet provided specifics on the exact types of data that may have been exposed, nor has it confirmed the number of individuals affected. The notice states that the information involved is personal in nature, underscoring the potential risk to those whose data may have been compromised.

Individuals who receive notifications related to this incident should remain vigilant. It is generally advisable to monitor financial accounts and credit reports for any unauthorized activity. Regularly reviewing statements and considering credit freezes or fraud alerts can help protect against potential misuse of your data.

This information is based on public filings made by Electronics For Imaging, Inc. with regulatory bodies. Official notices typically provide the most accurate and current details available about the breach and the steps the company is taking.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Electronics For Imaging, Inc. case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Electronics For Imaging, Inc. lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Electronics For Imaging, Inc. breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files