Where does the Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA incident. The state report is dated August 18, 2025.

Timeline

August 18, 2025Report filed in New HampshireDate the notice was lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: New Hampshire
Date reported: August 18, 2025
Receiving office: New Hampshire Attorney General

Case notes

Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA, an accounting firm based in New Hampshire, has submitted a formal data breach notification to state regulators. The report, filed on August 18, 2025, indicates an incident involving the compromise of personal information.

While the specific nature of the breach has not been detailed in the public filing, the firm confirms that an unauthorized exposure of sensitive data occurred. The report does not specify the types of personal information involved, nor does it provide a precise date when the breach initially took place.

As of the filing date, Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA is actively investigating the incident. The total number of individuals whose information may have been affected also remains unspecified during this ongoing inquiry. This investigation aims to clarify the full extent and circumstances of the data exposure.

Individuals who receive a direct notification from Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA regarding this incident should carefully review the information provided. It is generally recommended to monitor financial accounts and credit reports for any unusual activity. Remaining vigilant for unsolicited communications or suspicious requests for personal details can also help protect against potential misuse of information.

All details regarding this incident are based on official public disclosures made by Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA to regulatory bodies. Further updates will likely be provided as the firm’s investigation progresses and more concrete information becomes available.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

New Hampshire data breaches

Filing source: New Hampshire Attorney General

Named in the Harris, Burnett, Arend & Schmiesing, CPA breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More New Hampshire case files