Where does the James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute incident. The state report is dated December 12, 2025. The incident itself is dated January 28, 2025.

Timeline

318 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

January 28, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
December 12, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: December 12, 2025
Incident date: January 28, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute, a California-based entity, recently filed a report acknowledging a data security incident. This breach, discovered on January 28, 2025, was officially reported on December 12, 2025, according to public records.

The specific type of personal information compromised in this incident has not been detailed in the public filing. The report indicates that personal information was involved, but does not name any particular categories of sensitive data that may have been accessed or exposed.

At present, the investigation into the breach is ongoing, and the total number of individuals affected remains unspecified in the available documentation. Individuals who receive direct notification from Swift Institute should carefully review the information provided to understand the scope of the incident.

Given the nature of data breaches, general security precautions are advisable. This includes being vigilant for any unusual activity related to your accounts, such as unsolicited communications or suspicious financial statements. It is also recommended to monitor credit reports for any unauthorized activity.

Receiving an official breach notification letter is a critical step in understanding how this incident might affect you. Always rely on information directly from the organization involved and consider taking general steps to protect your personal information, as recommended by cybersecurity experts.

Questions about this case file

Where does the James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the James J. Lynch, MD Ltd. Dba Swift Institute breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files