Where does the Johnson Controls case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Johnson Controls lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Johnson Controls Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Johnson Controls incident. The state report is dated June 30, 2025. The incident itself is dated February 1, 2023.

Timeline

880 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

February 1, 2023Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
June 30, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: June 30, 2025
Incident date: February 1, 2023
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Johnson Controls, a global diversified technology and multi-industrial leader, has formally reported a data breach to regulators in California. This public filing, submitted on June 30, 2025, acknowledges an incident that potentially compromised sensitive personal information.

The breach originated from an event that occurred on February 1, 2023. At present, the company indicates that an investigation into the nature and scope of this incident is still underway, working to understand the full implications.

While the official filing does not specify the exact categories of personal information involved, it confirms that some customer or employee data was exposed. Individuals who receive notification from Johnson Controls should understand that some of their personal information may have been accessed without authorization.

Affected individuals are advised to remain vigilant by carefully reviewing statements from financial institutions and other accounts for any unusual activity. It is also recommended to consider placing a fraud alert or security freeze on credit reports as a precautionary measure to help prevent unauthorized access to credit.

Furthermore, exercise caution with unsolicited communications, especially those requesting personal details. Regularly update passwords for online accounts and use multi-factor authentication where available to enhance security for all personal information.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Johnson Controls case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Johnson Controls lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Johnson Controls breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files