Where does the Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard incident. The state report is dated February 28, 2025. The incident itself is dated July 19, 2024.

Timeline

224 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

July 19, 2024Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
February 28, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: February 28, 2025
Incident date: July 19, 2024
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, based in California, has publicly reported a data breach incident. The breach was discovered to have occurred on July 19, 2024, and the firm subsequently filed its official notification with regulatory bodies on February 28, 2025.

The details surrounding the nature of the breach remain unspecified in the public filing. However, the incident involved the potential exposure of personal information. The firm is currently investigating the full scope and impact of the event.

When personal information is compromised, individuals face potential risks that may include identity theft or misuse of their data. It is important for those who receive notification letters to understand the potential implications.

Individuals who have been informed about this incident should remain vigilant. Review all account statements and credit reports for any suspicious activity. Consider placing a fraud alert or security freeze on your credit files to help prevent unauthorized new accounts.

Additionally, be wary of unsolicited communications, such as emails or phone calls, that request personal details. Confirm the legitimacy of any such requests directly with the source. These general steps can help mitigate risks associated with exposed personal information.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files