Where does the LexisNexis Risk Solutions case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report LexisNexis Risk Solutions lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: LexisNexis Risk Solutions Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the LexisNexis Risk Solutions incident. The state report is dated June 3, 2025.

Timeline

June 3, 2025Report filed in New HampshireDate the notice was lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: New Hampshire
Date reported: June 3, 2025
Receiving office: New Hampshire Attorney General

Case notes

LexisNexis Risk Solutions has submitted a data breach notification to the State of New Hampshire, with a filing date of June 3, 2025. This report acknowledges an incident currently under investigation that involves the potential exposure of personal information. The type of breach that occurred has not been specified in the public record.

According to the official filing, the precise categories of personal information affected by this incident have not been disclosed. Therefore, while it is confirmed that personal information was involved, the exact data types remain unstated. This information comes from public disclosures made to state regulators.

As the number of individuals potentially impacted by this incident was not specified in the filing, no specific figure can be provided at this time. The public record indicates that the investigation into this data security event is still underway, and further details may emerge as the process continues.

Individuals who receive direct notification from LexisNexis Risk Solutions regarding this incident are advised to review the information carefully. General protective measures include remaining alert to any unusual activity across financial accounts and considering the use of credit monitoring services. These are broadly recommended precautions given the general nature of the exposed information.

This documentation serves to record the public filing by LexisNexis Risk Solutions in New Hampshire. It provides an overview of the reported incident based solely on the details made available through official channels.

Questions about this case file

Where does the LexisNexis Risk Solutions case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report LexisNexis Risk Solutions lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

New Hampshire data breaches

Filing source: New Hampshire Attorney General

Named in the LexisNexis Risk Solutions breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More New Hampshire case files