Where does the Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri incident. The state report is dated December 17, 2025. The incident itself is dated November 15, 2025.

Timeline

32 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

November 15, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
December 17, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: December 17, 2025
Incident date: November 15, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri, a firm based in California, has acknowledged a data security incident that took place on or around November 15, 2025. The incident was formally reported to regulators on December 17, 2025. The firm indicated that an investigation into the event is ongoing.

While the specific nature of the breach has not been detailed, the firm has confirmed that personal information was involved. The investigation is working to determine the full scope of the incident, including how the unauthorized access occurred and the specific data that may have been compromised.

Individuals who receive a direct notification from Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri should carefully read the letter. This official communication will contain the most accurate information regarding their specific situation and any resources the firm may offer. It is important to follow any instructions provided.

As a general protective measure following any data incident, it is advisable to remain vigilant against potential identity theft or fraud. Regularly monitor your financial accounts and statements for any suspicious activity. Consider placing a fraud alert or security freeze on your credit reports with the major credit bureaus.

Additionally, be cautious of unsolicited communications, such as emails or phone calls, that claim to be from the firm or related to the incident. Always verify the legitimacy of such communications directly with Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri through official channels, rather than clicking on links or providing information to unknown sources.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Lonich Patton Ehrlich Policastri breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files