Where does the Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney lodged with the Indiana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney incident. The state report is dated October 9, 2026. The incident itself is dated July 16, 2025.

Timeline

450 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

July 16, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
October 9, 2026Report filed in IndianaDate the notice was lodged with the Indiana Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: Indiana
Date reported: October 9, 2026
Incident date: July 16, 2025
Receiving office: Indiana Attorney General

Case notes

Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney, an Indiana-based entity, reported a data security incident that occurred on July 16, 2025. The company officially filed notification of this event on October 9, 2026, as documented in public records.

The specific nature of the breach, including how it occurred, remains unspecified in the available public filings. Similarly, the exact categories of personal information potentially affected by this incident were not detailed in the public report.

At the time of the filing, the investigation into this incident by Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney was ongoing and described as being in a 'monitoring' status. Individuals who receive a direct notification letter from the company should carefully review that document for any specific details pertinent to their situation.

In general, it is advisable for anyone potentially affected by a data incident to remain vigilant. This includes routinely monitoring existing accounts for any unusual or unauthorized activity and being cautious of unexpected communications, such as emails, texts, or phone calls that request personal information.

Enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA) on all online accounts where it is available can add an important layer of security. Always refer to your official notification letter from Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney for guidance and any specific recommendations they may offer.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney lodged with the Indiana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Indiana data breaches

Filing source: Indiana Attorney General

Named in the Martin, Magnuson, McCarthy & Kenney breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More Indiana case files