Where does the Mazur & Kittel, PLLC case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Mazur & Kittel, PLLC lodged with the Indiana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Mazur & Kittel, PLLC Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Mazur & Kittel, PLLC incident. The state report is dated October 29, 2026. The incident itself is dated July 13, 2026.

Timeline

108 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

July 13, 2026Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
October 29, 2026Report filed in IndianaDate the notice was lodged with the Indiana Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: Indiana
Date reported: October 29, 2026
Incident date: July 13, 2026
Receiving office: Indiana Attorney General

Case notes

Mazur & Kittel, PLLC, located in Indiana, officially reported a data security incident to the state’s Attorney General on October 29, 2026. This filing confirms an event where personal information held by the company may have been exposed, prompting official notification processes.

The breach itself was identified to have taken place on July 13, 2026. The specific nature of the breach—how it occurred or the methods used to access systems—was not detailed in the public record. Similarly, the exact categories of personal information involved remain unspecified in the filing.

The public filing does not specify how many individuals were potentially impacted by this incident or the precise types of data that were compromised. As such, any individual receiving a notification should carefully review it for details pertaining to their specific circumstances and the information that may have been affected.

Individuals who believe they may be affected by the Mazur & Kittel incident should remain vigilant. General recommended steps include monitoring financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity. It may also be prudent to update passwords for online accounts, especially if similar credentials are used across multiple services.

The status of the incident is currently listed as 'monitoring,' indicating ongoing assessment or response efforts. This information is derived from the official public filings with regulatory bodies.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Mazur & Kittel, PLLC case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Mazur & Kittel, PLLC lodged with the Indiana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Indiana data breaches

Filing source: Indiana Attorney General

Named in the Mazur & Kittel, PLLC breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More Indiana case files