Where does the Mehri & Skalet, PLLC case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Mehri & Skalet, PLLC lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Mehri & Skalet, PLLC Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Mehri & Skalet, PLLC incident. The state report is dated November 19, 2025. The incident itself is dated December 17, 2024.

Timeline

337 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

December 17, 2024Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
November 19, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: November 19, 2025
Incident date: December 17, 2024
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Mehri & Skalet, PLLC, a California-based entity, recently filed an official notification regarding a data breach. The incident, which exposed personal information, reportedly took place on December 17, 2024. The firm submitted its notice to regulators on November 19, 2025, detailing the event.

The specific nature of how the breach occurred remains unspecified in the available public records. Similarly, the precise categories of personal information involved have not been detailed. Data Breach Case File documents cases based strictly on reported facts, noting here that the filings use general terms to describe the affected data.

At present, the number of individuals whose information may have been compromised has not been disclosed, and the regulatory filing indicates that the investigation into the full scope of the incident is still ongoing. Further details are expected to emerge as the investigation progresses.

For those who may be impacted, widely recommended protective measures include carefully reviewing financial statements and explanation of benefits notices for any unauthorized activity. It is also advisable to monitor credit reports for suspicious inquiries or accounts that were not opened by you. Remaining cautious about unsolicited communications that request personal information is also a key step.

This information is compiled from public regulatory filings, serving as a record of reported data security incidents. Affected individuals should refer to official correspondence from Mehri & Skalet, PLLC for specific details relevant to their situation.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Mehri & Skalet, PLLC case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Mehri & Skalet, PLLC lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Mehri & Skalet, PLLC breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files