Where does the Merkle Inc. case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Merkle Inc. lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Merkle Inc. Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Merkle Inc. incident. The state report is dated February 6, 2026.

Timeline

February 6, 2026Report filed in New HampshireDate the notice was lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: New Hampshire
Date reported: February 6, 2026
Receiving office: New Hampshire Attorney General

Case notes

Merkle Inc. has formally reported a data security incident to the New Hampshire Attorney General's office. This notification serves as a public record of the event, consistent with regulatory requirements for organizations experiencing data compromises.

The official filing date for this incident is February 6, 2026. The nature of the breach itself remains unspecified in the public record, and the exact date when the breach occurred is currently unknown. Merkle Inc. has indicated that the matter is under investigation.

The specific categories of personal information involved in this incident have not been detailed in the public filing. Individuals should refer to any direct communications they receive from Merkle Inc. for precise information regarding their data.

While the number of individuals potentially affected by this event has not been specified in the public record, those who receive direct notification should understand that their personal information may have been involved.

For individuals concerned about their data, general protective measures are advisable. These include remaining vigilant for any unsolicited communications or unusual activity, particularly those requesting personal details. It is always prudent to be cautious about unexpected emails, texts, or calls.

This information is based solely on the public record filed with regulatory authorities. Any specific guidance or offers of identity protection services would typically be communicated directly by Merkle Inc. to affected individuals.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Merkle Inc. case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Merkle Inc. lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

New Hampshire data breaches

Filing source: New Hampshire Attorney General

Named in the Merkle Inc. breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More New Hampshire case files