Where does the Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS incident. The state report is dated October 23, 2025. The incident itself is dated January 20, 2025.

Timeline

276 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

January 20, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
October 23, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: October 23, 2025
Incident date: January 20, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS, based in California, has filed a public notification regarding a data security incident. This filing was made on October 23, 2025, detailing an event that occurred earlier in the year.

The breach, which is currently unspecified in type, reportedly took place on January 20, 2025. The specific categories of personal information involved in this incident have not been detailed in the public record. Individuals who may be affected are advised to await direct communication from Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS for definitive information.

As of the filing date, the incident remains under investigation. The public record does not provide further specifics regarding the nature of the breach or the extent of the compromised data at this time.

While details are still emerging, individuals who believe their personal information may have been involved should remain vigilant. It is generally recommended to monitor account statements and credit reports for any signs of unauthorized activity. Be cautious of unsolicited communications that claim to offer assistance related to this or any other data breach.

This information is based on public disclosures filed with regulatory authorities, reflecting the commitment to document reported data security incidents for public awareness and verification.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Michael R. Schwartz, MD, FACS breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files