Where does the Minyard Morris LLP case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Minyard Morris LLP lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Minyard Morris LLP Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Minyard Morris LLP incident. The state report is dated April 15, 2025. The incident itself is dated June 16, 2024.

Timeline

303 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

June 16, 2024Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
April 15, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: April 15, 2025
Incident date: June 16, 2024
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Minyard Morris LLP, a California-based organization, recently filed a data breach notification with regulators. This report stems from a security incident that they identified as occurring on or about June 16, 2024. The official public filing was made on April 15, 2025, detailing the circumstances of the breach.

The firm has confirmed that personal information was involved in this security event. While the specific nature of the data exposed has not been detailed in public records at this time, it is understood that the incident compromised some of the sensitive information entrusted to Minyard Morris LLP.

Currently, the investigation into the breach is ongoing. This means that details regarding the exact categories of personal data affected and the total number of individuals impacted are still being assessed. Public filings will likely be updated as more information becomes available.

Individuals who may be affected are advised to remain vigilant. It is generally recommended to regularly review account statements and credit reports for any suspicious activity. Consider enabling multi-factor authentication on online accounts where available to add an extra layer of security.

This information is derived from public records and regulatory filings. Minyard Morris LLP continues its inquiry into the incident, working to understand the extent of the unauthorized access and to secure the affected systems.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Minyard Morris LLP case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Minyard Morris LLP lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Minyard Morris LLP breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files