Where does the Murphy and Grantland, PA case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Murphy and Grantland, PA lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Murphy and Grantland, PA Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Murphy and Grantland, PA incident. The state report is dated October 29, 2025.

Timeline

October 29, 2025Report filed in New HampshireDate the notice was lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: New Hampshire
Date reported: October 29, 2025
Receiving office: New Hampshire Attorney General

Case notes

Murphy and Grantland, PA, a professional association, has reported a data security incident to regulators in New Hampshire. The filing, dated October 29, 2025, indicates that the organization is currently investigating the scope and nature of the event. The specific type of breach and the date it occurred remain unknown at this time.

The public record for this case does not specify the exact categories of personal information that may have been exposed. Similarly, the total number of individuals impacted by this incident has not been disclosed in the public filing.

Such reports are filed to inform state authorities about security compromises affecting residents. As of the filing date, the investigation into this incident by Murphy and Grantland, PA is ongoing, aiming to understand the full circumstances and impact.

Individuals who believe they may be affected by a data incident should consider general protective measures. These commonly include reviewing financial statements and other personal account activity for any unusual transactions or unfamiliar entries.

Monitoring credit reports can also help identify any unauthorized activity related to identity theft. While the specific data involved here is not detailed, remaining alert to potential misuse of your personal information is a proactive step. For tailored advice, individuals should refer to any direct notifications they may receive.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Murphy and Grantland, PA case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Murphy and Grantland, PA lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

New Hampshire data breaches

Filing source: New Hampshire Attorney General

Named in the Murphy and Grantland, PA breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More New Hampshire case files