Where does the Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC incident. The state report is dated November 18, 2025. The incident itself is dated April 7, 2025.

Timeline

225 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

April 7, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
November 18, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: November 18, 2025
Incident date: April 7, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC, located in California, submitted a data breach notification to regulators on November 18, 2025. This filing acknowledges an incident that impacted personal information held by the organization, though specific details remain undisclosed in the public record.

The breach event itself occurred on April 7, 2025. As of the filing date, the investigation into the incident is ongoing. The public documentation does not specify the categories of personal information that were exposed or the total number of individuals whose data may have been compromised.

When a data breach occurs, it means that unauthorized parties may have accessed sensitive information. While the exact nature of the information involved in this incident has not been publicly detailed, it is important for individuals to understand the potential risks associated with any compromise of personal data.

Individuals who receive official notification regarding this breach are encouraged to remain vigilant. Recommended steps include regularly reviewing financial statements and account activity for any discrepancies or unauthorized transactions. Additionally, it is wise to be cautious of unsolicited communications, such as emails or phone calls, that request personal information.

Staying informed and taking proactive measures are critical protective steps. While specific advice regarding data types cannot be given due to the unspecified nature of the breach, general security practices can help mitigate potential risks associated with the exposure of personal information.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, APC breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files