Where does the Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging lodged with the Oregon Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging incident. The state report is dated October 29, 2025. The incident itself is dated January 20, 2025.

Timeline

282 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

January 20, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
October 29, 2025Report filed in OregonDate the notice was lodged with the Oregon Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: Oregon
Date reported: October 29, 2025
Incident date: January 20, 2025
Receiving office: Oregon Attorney General

Case notes

Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging, an Oregon-based entity, have formally reported a data incident to regulators. This public filing confirms an event that potentially exposed personal information, prompting individuals to take protective measures.

The breach, which was identified as occurring on January 20, 2025, involved an unspecified type of security incident. The official notification regarding this event was submitted on October 29, 2025, as part of compliance requirements.

At the time of the filing, the investigation into the full scope and nature of the incident was noted as ongoing. Public records do not specify the exact categories of personal information that may have been compromised.

Individuals who have received direct notification from Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging should carefully review the information provided. It is generally recommended to remain vigilant, monitor financial accounts and credit reports for suspicious activity, and be cautious of unsolicited communications.

These details are drawn from official public disclosures made by Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging. The purpose of these filings is to inform potentially affected individuals and the public about security incidents.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging lodged with the Oregon Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Oregon data breaches

Filing source: Oregon Attorney General

Named in the Northwest Radiologists and Mt. Baker Imaging breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More Oregon case files