Where does the Progress Foundation case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Progress Foundation lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Progress Foundation Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Progress Foundation incident. The state report is dated February 12, 2026. The incident itself is dated February 2, 2026.

Timeline

10 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

February 2, 2026Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
February 12, 2026Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: February 12, 2026
Incident date: February 2, 2026
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Progress Foundation, a California-based entity, recently filed a public notification acknowledging a data incident. The report, submitted on February 12, 2026, indicates that the underlying event took place on February 2, 2026. This filing serves as a public record of the incident.

The organization stated that the incident involved personal information. However, the specific categories of data that may have been exposed have not been detailed in the publicly available records. The situation is currently under investigation, as noted in the official filing.

Details regarding the precise nature of the breach, such as how the unauthorized access occurred, remain unspecified in the public documents. Additionally, the number of individuals potentially affected by this incident has not been disclosed in the public record.

Individuals who believe they may be impacted by this incident should remain vigilant. It is generally advisable to monitor personal accounts for any unusual activity and be cautious of unsolicited communications requesting personal details. Placing a fraud alert on credit files can also provide an additional layer of protection.

This documentation is based solely on the public filing made by Progress Foundation with regulatory bodies. It provides a factual overview of the reported data incident without speculation or additional information beyond what has been officially disclosed.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Progress Foundation case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Progress Foundation lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Progress Foundation breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files