Where does the Racine Olson, PLLP case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Racine Olson, PLLP lodged with the Montana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Racine Olson, PLLP Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Racine Olson, PLLP incident. The state report is dated December 12, 2025. The incident itself is dated May 20, 2025.

Timeline

206 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

May 20, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
December 12, 2025Report filed in MontanaDate the notice was lodged with the Montana Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: Montana
Date reported: December 12, 2025
Incident date: May 20, 2025
Receiving office: Montana Attorney General

Case notes

Racine Olson, PLLP has formally reported a data event to regulators, stemming from an incident identified on May 20, 2025. This notification, filed on December 12, 2025, details a situation where personal information may have been accessed or acquired without authorization.

While the specific categories of data involved in this incident have not been detailed in public records, the report confirms that certain personal information was affected. The firm has indicated that an investigation into the scope and impact of this event is currently underway.

The incident came to light following the breach date of May 20, 2025, with the official filing occurring several months later. This timeline reflects the period required for investigation and preparation before public notification.

Individuals who receive direct notification from Racine Olson, PLLP are encouraged to take proactive measures. These steps typically include monitoring financial statements and account activity for any unusual transactions, remaining cautious about unsolicited communications, and considering placing a fraud alert or credit freeze with credit bureaus.

These details are drawn directly from public regulatory filings. This case file serves to document the reported facts of the incident as they become available through official channels.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Racine Olson, PLLP case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Racine Olson, PLLP lodged with the Montana Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Montana data breaches

Filing source: Montana Attorney General

Named in the Racine Olson, PLLP breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More Montana case files