Where does the SimonMed Imaging case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report SimonMed Imaging lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: SimonMed Imaging Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the SimonMed Imaging incident. The state report is dated October 14, 2025.

Timeline

October 14, 2025Report filed in New HampshireDate the notice was lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: New Hampshire
Date reported: October 14, 2025
Receiving office: New Hampshire Attorney General

Case notes

SimonMed Imaging has officially reported a data security incident to regulators in New Hampshire. The public filing for this breach was made on October 14, 2025, detailing an incident that compromised certain personal information.

The nature of the breach, including how it occurred, was not specified in the public record. The report indicates that personal information was involved in the incident, but the specific categories of data impacted have not been disclosed.

The number of individuals potentially affected by this breach also remains undisclosed in the public filing. As of the report date, SimonMed Imaging stated that an investigation into the incident is ongoing to determine its full scope and impact.

Individuals who may have received a notification letter from SimonMed Imaging are encouraged to review it carefully for personalized guidance and to understand the specific details communicated. It is important to compare any received notices against publicly available information.

General protective measures include remaining vigilant for any unusual activity involving personal accounts or the information involved. Consider monitoring financial statements and credit reports for unauthorized transactions or suspicious inquiries. If any discrepancies are found, report them immediately to the relevant financial institutions or credit bureaus.

Questions about this case file

Where does the SimonMed Imaging case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report SimonMed Imaging lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

New Hampshire data breaches

Filing source: New Hampshire Attorney General

Named in the SimonMed Imaging breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More New Hampshire case files