DataBreachCaseFile.com

Case file

Case File: UFCW Local 135 Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the UFCW Local 135 incident. The state report is dated January 28, 2025. The incident itself is dated August 23, 2024.

Timeline

158 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

  1. August 23, 2024Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
  2. January 28, 2025Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state
California
Date reported
January 28, 2025
Incident date
August 23, 2024
Receiving office
California Attorney General

Case notes

UFCW Local 135, a labor union operating in California, has officially reported a data compromise to regulatory bodies. The incident, which took place on August 23, 2024, was formally filed on January 28, 2025.

According to the publicly available records, the exact nature of the breach event and the specific categories of personal information exposed have not been detailed. Organizations typically notify individuals whose data may have been affected, providing more specific context directly to them.

The number of individuals potentially impacted by this incident also remains unspecified in the public filing. The investigation into the incident is currently ongoing, as noted in the report.

Individuals who receive a notification from UFCW Local 135 should carefully review the information provided. It is always recommended to monitor financial accounts and credit reports for any suspicious activity following a data compromise. Consider placing a fraud alert or security freeze on your credit if you are concerned.

Staying informed about such incidents and taking proactive steps to protect your identity are crucial. These details are derived from public filings made with regulatory authorities.

Questions about this case file

Where does the UFCW Local 135 case file come from?
Every entry is taken from the breach report UFCW Local 135 lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?
Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?
It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?
Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.
California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General