Where does the UFCW Local 342 case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report UFCW Local 342 lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: UFCW Local 342 Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the UFCW Local 342 incident. The state report is dated March 12, 2026.

Timeline

March 12, 2026Report filed in New HampshireDate the notice was lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: New Hampshire
Date reported: March 12, 2026
Receiving office: New Hampshire Attorney General

Case notes

UFCW Local 342, a labor union, recently disclosed a data incident to state authorities in New Hampshire. This disclosure was officially filed on March 12, 2026, marking the formal public acknowledgment of the event.

At present, the nature of this data incident, including how it occurred, remains unspecified in the available public records. Similarly, the precise categories of personal information that may have been exposed are not detailed, so it is referred to broadly as "your data" or "the information involved."

Details regarding the total number of individuals potentially affected by this incident are also not specified in the current public filings. The breach date is currently listed as unknown, and the overall investigation into the event is ongoing.

Individuals who are current or former members of UFCW Local 342 should exercise caution and closely monitor their personal and financial accounts for any suspicious activity. Reviewing credit reports regularly and being wary of unsolicited communications, especially those requesting personal details, are general recommended precautions.

This information is compiled from official public filings submitted to state regulators and is presented to help individuals understand the scope of reported data incidents. Further details may emerge as the investigation progresses and additional information becomes publicly available.

Questions about this case file

Where does the UFCW Local 342 case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report UFCW Local 342 lodged with the New Hampshire Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

New Hampshire data breaches

Filing source: New Hampshire Attorney General

Named in the UFCW Local 342 breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More New Hampshire case files