Where does the Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group case file come from?

Every entry is taken from the breach report Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.

Why do the incident date and the report date differ?

Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.

What does the records-affected figure count?

It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.

Does this case file change over time?

Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

Case file

Case File: Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group Data Breach

This file collects the dated facts on record for the Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group incident. The state report is dated March 2, 2026. The incident itself is dated September 12, 2025.

Timeline

171 days separate the incident date from the date it was reported.

September 12, 2025Incident dateWhen the filing says the breach took place.
March 2, 2026Report filed in CaliforniaDate the notice was lodged with the California Attorney General.

Case facts

Filing state: California
Date reported: March 2, 2026
Incident date: September 12, 2025
Receiving office: California Attorney General

Case notes

Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group, based in California, has disclosed a data security incident impacting its systems. The breach reportedly took place on September 12, 2025. The company officially reported the incident on March 2, 2026, and indicates that an investigation into the event is ongoing.

Public filings do not specify the exact nature of the breach or the categories of personal information that may have been compromised. Valley Radiology Consultants has not yet detailed what specific types of data were involved in the unauthorized access or disclosure.

As the investigation continues, individuals who may be affected should monitor their personal accounts and be vigilant for any unusual activity. If you receive a direct notification from Valley Radiology Consultants, it will provide more specific details relevant to your situation.

While the company works to understand the full scope of the incident, it is generally recommended that individuals remain cautious. This includes being wary of unsolicited communications, reviewing statements for unfamiliar transactions, and considering placing a fraud alert or security freeze on credit reports.

Further specifics regarding the extent of the incident and the types of personal information affected are expected to be released as the investigation concludes. Any official updates would typically be communicated directly to affected individuals and potentially through updated public filings.

Questions about this case file

Where does the Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group case file come from?: Every entry is taken from the breach report Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group lodged with the California Attorney General. Nothing here is estimated.
Why do the incident date and the report date differ?: Companies usually investigate before they report. The gap between the two dates shows how long that took.
What does the records-affected figure count?: It is the number the company gave the state. It can cover residents of that state only, so the national total may be higher.
Does this case file change over time?: Yes. When a company files an update or a new state publishes its copy of the report, the dates and counts here are refreshed.

California data breaches

Filing source: California Attorney General

Named in the Valley Radiology Consultants Medical Group breach?

Attach your notice and a short note. An attorney checks it against this case file at no cost.

Timeline

Case facts

Case notes

Questions about this case file

More California case files